Questions for you:
- Am I too attached to a single framework or approach when solving problems, and if so, how can I change that?
- What would it mean to hold multiple contradictory perspectives simultaneously?
- Do I give myself permission to recombine ideas from different sources without feeling like I’m being inconsistent, or simply stealing, or just remixing the work of others rather than truly being “creative” – whatever that means?
- When can you next buy a random magazine from a newsstand as you pass, or a random book from a second hand bookshop, or watch a random documentary on your favourite streaming service?
Organisational applications:
Organisational Applications: “When did you last borrow from an unlikely source?”
Cross-domain expertise rotation programmes:
Like David Bowie absorbing influences from mime, theatre, electronic music, soul, and experimental art, organisations should deliberately rotate employees across unrelated domains to force cognitive flexibility. Implement “borrowed expertise” secondments in which specialists spend time in completely unrelated departments—engineers shadowing sales teams, finance analysts working with creative departments, and operations managers participating in research divisions. Not to become proficient, but to absorb alternative frameworks for problem-solving. Track whether exposure to incompatible conceptual frameworks enables employees to recombine approaches in novel ways, versus specialists remaining within single domains. The goal isn’t skill transfer but cognitive flexibility—the ability to switch between contradictory frameworks without getting trapped in single modes of thinking.
Ideology-resistant strategy development:
Most organisations develop strategic approaches and then enforce doctrinal consistency, punishing intellectual “inconsistency.” But like evolution recombining genetic material rather than inventing purely new species, breakthrough strategies often emerge from recombining established but incompatible frameworks. Create explicit permission for “ideology-free zones” where teams can simultaneously explore contradictory strategic approaches without requiring philosophical coherence. Business model might combine elements from incompatible sources—subscription economics from software, manufacturing efficiency from automotive, customer service from hospitality—despite frameworks suggesting conflicting priorities. Document whether ideology-resistant recombination produces viable strategies versus enforced consistency, yielding incremental variations on existing approaches.
Unlikely influence requirement in innovation processes:
When developing new products, services, or strategies, mandate the inclusion of at least one influence from a completely unrelated domain. Like forcing a connection between “nose” and “photocopier design” (a photocopier emits a lavender scent when low on paper), this approach requires teams to incorporate insights from industries, disciplines, or contexts that have no obvious relevance. Not superficial borrowing but deep understanding enabling productive recombination. Engineers must study biological systems, marketers must analyse military strategy, and designers must explore mathematical concepts. Track whether mandatory unlikely influences produce qualitatively different innovation versus purely industry-focused analysis. The challenge: deep enough understanding to recognise productive combinations rather than surface-level mimicry.
Cognitive multiculturalism cultivation:
Anne-Laure Le Cunff’s “cognitive multiculturalism” describes the ability to hold multiple contradictory perspectives simultaneously—essential for idea recombination but threatening to organisations demanding consistency. Develop explicit tolerance for employees maintaining fluidity across frameworks rather than adopting a single corporate ideology. Reward people who productively combine incompatible approaches rather than punishing apparent inconsistency. Like skilled DJs blending diverse influences into coherent new works, valuable employees should seamlessly recombine contradictory frameworks whilst maintaining professional coherence. Measure whether cognitive multiculturalism produces more adaptive organisations than ideological consistency, which yields predictable but inflexible strategies.
Further reading
Cognitive Flexibility (Wikipedia overview). Introduction to cognitive flexibility concept including neurological basis and implications for creative problem-solving.
Cognitive Multiculturalism by Anne-Laure Le Cunff (Ness Labs). Framework for holding multiple contradictory perspectives simultaneously, enabling productive idea recombination across incompatible domains.
The Medici Effect: What Elephants and Epidemics Can Teach Us About Innovation by Frans Johansson (Harvard Business Review Press, 2006). Examination of how breakthrough innovation emerges at intersections of different disciplines through cross-domain recombination rather than single-field expertise.
On creative recombination:
Where Good Ideas Come From: The Natural History of Innovation by Steven Johnson (Riverhead Books, 2010). Documents how innovation emerges from connecting disparate elements including borrowing from unlikely sources and recombining existing concepts in unprecedented ways.
Steal Like an Artist: 10 Things Nobody Told You About Being Creative by Austin Kleon (Workman Publishing, 2012). Accessible guide to creative borrowing and recombination including techniques for productively drawing on diverse influences without superficial copying.
The Innovator’s DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators by Jeff Dyer, Hal Gregersen, and Clayton M. Christensen (Harvard Business Review Press, 2011). Research on innovation capabilities including “associating”—ability to connect questions, problems, or ideas from unrelated fields.
On David Bowie and creative reinvention:
David Bowie: A Life by Dylan Jones (Crown Archetype, 2017). Comprehensive biography including how Bowie systematically reinvented himself by absorbing influences from radically different domains throughout his career.
Rebel Rebel: All the Songs of David Bowie from ’64 to ’76 by Chris O’Leary (Zero Books, 2015). Detailed analysis of Bowie’s creative process including how he borrowed and recombined influences from mime, electronic music, theatre, and visual art.
The Man Who Sold the World: David Bowie and the 1970s by Peter Doggett (The Bodley Head, 2011). Examination of Bowie’s most creatively fluid period, documenting systematic approach to borrowing from unlikely sources and recombining incompatible influences.
About the image:
Another one of the handful of LLM images in the book, this one draws inspiration from Rudolph Zallinger’s illustration The March of Progress.
Illustration Matt Ballantine 2026.
